Caleb Chakravarthi vs Jonathan Binding H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Chakravarthi VS Binding Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Caleb Chakravarthi and Jonathan Binding stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 24-07-2017 in the Q1 round Round at the USA F25 (Champaign), Chakravarthi got the win with 6-3 2-6 7-6(4). Chakravarthi stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Binding is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
985 ( 05-08-19)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Chakravarthi VS Binding H2H Matches played
|
|
USA F25 (Champaign) | ||||||||
|
24 Jul 2017 Q1 |
6
3
2
6
7
6
|
||||||||
Chakravarthi VS Binding Head to head matches stats
| stats | Caleb Chakravarthi | Jonathan Binding |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 15 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Caleb Chakravarthi past matches
|
|
Dallas Open - Dallas | ||||||||
|
08 Feb 2022 R1 |
6
1
6
0
|
L
|
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Caleb Chakravarthi
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Nov 2018 Q1 |
3
6
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Timur Khabibulin
Player
Caleb Chakravarthi
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
11
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F19 (Wichita) | ||||||||
|
01 Jul 2018 Q1 |
6
4
2
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
USA F1 (Los Angeles) | ||||||||
|
31 Dec 2017 Q1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Nov 2017 Q1 |
4
6
6
4
7
5
|
L
|
Noe Khlif
Player
Caleb Chakravarthi
73%
(
77 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Jonathan Binding past matches
|
|
M25 Roehampton 1 | ||||||||
|
11 Jul 2022 QF |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Finn Murgett
Player
Jonathan Binding
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
H2H | |||||
|
10 Jul 2022 Q1 |
6
4
6
0
|
W
|
Jonathan Binding
Player
Nicholas Jovanovski
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 New Delhi 1 | ||||||||
|
28 Mar 2021 Q1 |
6
3
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
28 Mar 2021 Q2 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Pune 1 | ||||||||
|
21 Mar 2021 Q1 |
7
6
7
5
|
L
|
Leonardo Catani
Player
Jonathan Binding
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Chakravarthi VS Binding matches vs all opponents
| stats | Caleb Chakravarthi | Jonathan Binding |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 56% (52/41) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 45% (13/16) | 56% (121/94) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (138/128) | 53% (1069/959) |
| Hard W/L | 46% (6/7) | 56% (52/41) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0 | 0.05 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 51 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 0.12 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 122 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 772.15 | 877.03 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (817/1348) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (546/817) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 45% (238/531) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 44% (48/110) |
| Return Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 38% (492/1280) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 46% (6/7) | 56% (52/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (6/13) | 56% (52/93) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 25% (1/4) | 62% (16/26) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 67% (2/3) | 41% (12/29) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (6/6) | 82% (55/45) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (6/0) | 18% (55/10) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (7/0) | 18% (38/7) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Chakravarthi VS Binding H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Prozorova Vs Kraus Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Anisimova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Bartunkova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Prozorova Vs Kraus Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Anisimova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Bartunkova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
