Caio Zampieri vs Maciek Sykut H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Zampieri VS Sykut Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Caio Zampieri and Maciek Sykut stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 22-08-2011 in the Second Round at the Colombia F4, Zampieri got the win with 3-6 6-3 6-4. Zampieri stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Sykut is no. Ret..
Caio Zampieri
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
182 ( 19-07-10)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Maciek Sykut
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
578 ( 08-08-11)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
1
Total
0
0
Hard
0
1
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
40 (27-05-1986)
Age
40 (21-06-1986)
183
Height
188
79
Weight
84
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Unknown
Backhand
Two-Handed
Andre Podalka
Coach
2005
Turned Pro
59% (422-290)
Career Total W/L
43% (62-83)
56% (93-72)
Career Hard W/L
46% (37-43)
60% (325-214)
Career Clay W/L
40% (23-35)
40% (2-3)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
67% (2-1)
Career Indoor W/L
29% (2-5)
$42,800
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Zampieri VS Sykut H2H Matches played
|
Colombia F4 | ||||||||
|
22 Aug 2011 R2 |
3
6
6
3
6
4
|
||||||||
Zampieri VS Sykut Head to head matches stats
| stats | Caio Zampieri | Maciek Sykut |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Caio Zampieri past matches
Before:
|
|
Santo Domingo Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 Aug 2017 R1 |
4
6
6
1
6
3
|
L
|
Gianni Mina
Player
Caio Zampieri
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Germany F8 (Kassel) | ||||||||
|
18 Jul 2017 R1 |
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Caio Zampieri
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Vicenza Challenger | ||||||||
|
27 May 2017 Q1 |
6
2
|
L
|
Alejandro Falla
Player
Caio Zampieri
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
69%
(
20 of
29)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
30
Total Points Won
20
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Mestre Challenger | ||||||||
|
24 May 2017 R2 |
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
Gianluigi Quinzi
Player
Caio Zampieri
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
|
23 May 2017 R1 |
6
4
4
6
7
6
|
W
|
Caio Zampieri
Player
Andrea Arnaboldi
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
111)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Maciek Sykut past matches
Before:
|
|
Cali Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Sep 2012 Q1 |
6
2
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
10 Sep 2012 QF |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
Lexington Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Jul 2012 Q1 |
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
Toshihide Matsui
Player
Maciek Sykut
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
4
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Binghamton Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Jul 2012 R1 |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
Jamie Baker
Player
Maciek Sykut
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Jul 2012 QF |
4
6
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Andrew Carter
Player
Maciek Sykut
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Zampieri VS Sykut matches vs all opponents
| stats | Caio Zampieri | Maciek Sykut |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 56% (93/72) | 46% (37/43) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 53% (200/174) | 47% (84/93) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (1782/1730) | 50% (823/839) |
| Hard W/L | 56% (93/72) | 46% (37/43) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.11 | 0.02 |
| Total Aces | 185 | 18 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 | 0.02 |
| Total Double Faults | 87 | 17 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1088.43 | 1158.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (2194/3398) | 57% (168/293) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1468/2194) | 71% (120/168) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (592/1204) | 46% (58/125) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (120/291) | 35% (11/31) |
| Return Points Won % | 37% (1268/3406) | 38% (116/308) |
| Slam W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (58/49) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (31/17) | 49% (35/37) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (91/163) | 46% (36/79) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 53% (30/57) | 39% (9/23) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 65% (30/46) | 33% (6/18) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (82/75) | 83% (40/33) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (82/7) | 18% (40/7) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (83/18) | 8% (40/3) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Zampieri VS Sykut H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Tsitsipas Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 1st July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Kudermetova Vs Samsonova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Lehecka Vs Popyrin Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Shnaider Vs Lys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Molcan Vs Altmaier Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Tsitsipas Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 1st July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Kudermetova Vs Samsonova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Lehecka Vs Popyrin Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Shnaider Vs Lys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Molcan Vs Altmaier Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 30th June 2026 (Day 2)
