Andrey Chepelev vs Manuel Mazza H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Chepelev VS Mazza Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Andrey Chepelev and Manuel Mazza stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 23-04-2026 in the Quarterfinals Round at the M25 Santa Margherita di Pula, Mazza got the win with 3-6 6-2 6-4. Chepelev stands at no. 418 in the rankings, whilst Mazza is no. 565.
Ranking
418 ( 18-06-26)
Best Rank
339 ( 26-09-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
565 ( 18-06-26)
Best Rank
509 ( 04-08-25)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Chepelev upcoming match
Chepelev VS Mazza H2H Matches played
|
|
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula | ||||||||
|
23 Apr 2026 QF |
Manuel Mazza
Player
Andrey Chepelev
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
3
6
6
2
6
4
|
|||||||
Chepelev VS Mazza Head to head matches stats
| stats | Andrey Chepelev | Manuel Mazza |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 12 | 15 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Total Double Faults | 5 | 2 |
| Average Match Time | 2:34:50 | 2:34:50 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (55/84) | 56% (50/89) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 64% (35/55) | 70% (35/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) | 46% (18/39) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (3/9) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Pts Won % | 40% (36/89) | 44% (37/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Andrey Chepelev past matches
|
|
M25 Samobor | ||||||||
|
18 Jun 2026 R2 |
6
4
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
17 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Kiseljak | ||||||||
|
14 Jun 2026 F |
6
3
6
2
|
W
|
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
13 Jun 2026 SF |
1
6
7
6
6
4
|
W
|
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
69%
(
72 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
4
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
|
13 Jun 2026 QF |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Yaroslav Demin
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Manuel Mazza past matches
|
|
M25 Milano | ||||||||
|
16 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
7
7
5
6
2
|
L
|
Marcello Serafini
Player
Manuel Mazza
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
56 of
76)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
38 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
107
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Cattolica Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Jun 2026 QF |
3
6
7
6
6
0
|
L
|
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Manuel Mazza
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
H2H | |||||
|
07 Jun 2026 Q1 |
6
7
6
0
3
1
|
W
|
Manuel Mazza
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
77%
(
75 of
98)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
70
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Perugia Challenger | ||||||||
|
01 Jun 2026 QF |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Manuel Mazza
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
H2H | |||||
|
31 May 2026 Q1 |
6
4
0
6
6
3
|
W
|
Manuel Mazza
Player
Ioannis Xilas
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
73
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Chepelev VS Mazza matches vs all opponents
| stats | Andrey Chepelev | Manuel Mazza |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 38% (8/13) | 53% (10/9) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 36% (16/28) | 56% (23/18) |
| Games Won/Lost | 44% (172/220) | 53% (208/182) |
| Hard W/L | 38% (8/13) | 53% (10/9) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.06 | 0.23 |
| Total Aces | 11 | 44 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 | 0.09 |
| Total Double Faults | 61 | 17 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:4:6 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 638.1 | 498.53 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (720/1051) | 60% (492/825) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 60% (430/720) | 71% (347/492) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (144/331) | 50% (166/333) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (33/80) | 36% (33/91) |
| Return Points Won % | 36% (348/977) | 38% (329/865) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 39% (7/11) | 53% (10/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 35% (7/20) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (6/6) | 100% (10/10) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (6/0) | 0% (10/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (15/2) | 0% (9/0) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Chepelev VS Mazza H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Golubic Vs Sonmez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Kubka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Yastremska Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Golubic Vs Sonmez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Kubka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Yastremska Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
