Amine Chadli vs Lamine Ouahab H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Chadli VS Ouahab Head to Head: 0 - 1
The H2H record between Amine Chadli and Lamine Ouahab stands at 0 - 1. In their last encounter on 17-09-2016 in the Q1 round Round at the Kenitra Challenger, Ouahab got the win with 6-1 6-1. Chadli stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Ouahab is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1803 ( 11-07-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
114 ( 21-09-09)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Chadli VS Ouahab H2H Matches played
|
|
Kenitra Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 Sep 2016 Q1 |
Lamine Ouahab
Player
Amine Chadli
39%
(
18 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6
1
6
1
|
|||||||
Chadli VS Ouahab Head to head matches stats
| stats | Amine Chadli | Lamine Ouahab |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 2 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 2 |
| Average Match Time | 0:47:49 | 0:47:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (20/33) | 39% (18/46) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 20% (4/20) | 67% (12/18) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (4/13) | 61% (17/28) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 25% (1/4) | 86% (6/7) |
| Return Pts Won % | 37% (17/46) | 76% (25/33) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Amine Chadli past matches
|
|
Morocco F5 (Beni Mellal) | ||||||||
|
06 Nov 2017 Q1 |
6
7
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Morocco F3 (Casablanca) | ||||||||
|
31 Jul 2017 Q1 |
6
4
6
1
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
31 Jul 2017 Q2 |
2
6
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Morocco F2 (Mohammedia) | ||||||||
|
24 Jul 2017 Q1 |
6
2
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
24 Jul 2017 Q2 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Lamine Ouahab past matches
|
|
M15 Benicarlo 1 | ||||||||
|
07 Nov 2022 Q2 |
6
2
2
6
10
8
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
06 Nov 2022 Q1 |
6
4
1
6
10
5
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Zaragoza 1 | ||||||||
|
03 Oct 2022 QF |
6
1
0
6
10
8
|
L
|
Mario Mansilla Diez
Player
Lamine Ouahab
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
53
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
02 Oct 2022 Q1 |
6
4
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Madrid 1 | ||||||||
|
13 Sep 2022 R1 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
John Echeverria
Player
Lamine Ouahab
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Chadli VS Ouahab matches vs all opponents
| stats | Amine Chadli | Lamine Ouahab |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (64/42) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 0% (0/0) | 58% (140/100) |
| Games Won/Lost | 0% (0/0) | 53% (1177/1044) |
| Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (64/42) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0 | 0.05 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 58 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 0.1 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 108 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 0 | 958.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (1457/2454) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (943/1457) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 49% (493/997) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 47% (123/264) |
| Return Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 41% (1037/2520) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (20/17) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 66% (37/19) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (61/101) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 50% (12/24) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (16/27) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 90% (61/55) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 10% (61/6) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 20% (45/9) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Chadli VS Ouahab H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Humbert Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Humbert Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Krueger Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 23rd June 2026 (Day -5)
-
Birrell Vs Krejcikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Wang Vs Fernandez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Bad Homburg Open – Bad Homburg – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Humbert Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Humbert Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Krueger Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 23rd June 2026 (Day -5)
-
Birrell Vs Krejcikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Wang Vs Fernandez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Bad Homburg Open – Bad Homburg – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
