Should Andy Roddick Retire Now?

Share & Comment

Having been a consistent top 10 player for 9 years, Andy Roddick’s ranking has started to head south. He’s currently ranked number 29 in the world, and there have been increasing calls for his retirement over the last 6 months.

He last made a Grand Slam final in 2009 (Wimbledon) and he hasn’t won a Slam title since 2003 (US Open).

If it wasn’t for a certain Swiss Federer, Roddick would probably be a 3 time Wimbledon winner and legend of US tennis, but even this would not stop the onslaught of retirement calls as his ranking slides (as Sampras can attest to).

While British no.1 Murray is touted as possible the best player in history not to have won a Slam title, you could equally argue that Roddick could be the best grass court player never to have lifted the trophy on the grass courts of Wimbledon.

To be honest it’s pretty unfair to push a player into retirement, particularly as Roddick has carried the flag for American tennis for a decade, and if he enjoys the game he should be allowed to pick when he retires.

Also, it’s not like he has had a string of debilitating injuries, and we should not forget Ivanisevic came out of the tennis wilderness to win a first Wimbledon and Grand Slam title at the age of 29 (Wimbledon 2001). While an Andy Roddick future Grand Slam victory may seem like an extreme long shot, the same could also have been said of Ivanisevic before the 2001 Wimbledon Championships. Indeed his ranking was so low he had to rely on a wildcard to get into the draw, and he’s been quoted as saying he could hardly even hit the ball properly at the Queens warm up tournament.

However, given Roddick’s feisty competitive nature (he probably argues with more match officials than any other player), perhaps media calls for his retirement may spur him on to reverse his current slump.

After being asked by a local reporter at the China Open whether he is considering retiring, an irritated Roddick replied: “I think you should retire.”

Although Sampras was a different class of player, we should also not forget that the media who had written headlines like “For Pete’s Sake Retire”, ended up with egg on their faces after he came back and won the 2002 US Open. Seeded 17th, he broke a run of 33 tournaments without a victory.

With a huge vacuum of US players at the summit of the world game, people should perhaps be careful what they wish for. On the contrary, lets hope a Roddick resurgence is just round the corner.

You Love Tennis Right...

Join the tennis club for free. Just enter your email below for...

  • Tennis news updates once a week.
  • Special offers on tennis gear.
  • Unsubscribe at any time.
  • We will never share your email.

4 thoughts on “Should Andy Roddick Retire Now?

  1. Read some really nasty comments about A-Rod online and its terrible that people write bad things about him. he’s done his best and is a real fighter. Problem is Courrier, Agassi and Sampras spoiled the american public and they think anything less than a multiple grand slam winner is a looser. It may be several years or even decades before a US player is number 1 again. After Serena and Venus retire its probably going to be the same in the womens game so should appreciate them as well.

  2. smiley

    He has been a truly great tennis player, shame about those Wimby finals man!! But got to give it to Andy, well done!

  3. Give the guy a break. He probably has nightmares about that backhand volley he missed against Fed that would have won him the wimb title. Agree wth what you say about motivating him as was a great victory over Federer in Miami last week. Thats 2 in a row over him now..

Leave a Reply