


found out why, he's playing an exhibition tournament in london that week 
http://www.liverpooltennis.co.uk/PatatRiek wrote:was surprised Malisse didn't sign up for any of the tournamentsfound out why, he's playing an exhibition tournament in london that week
if you have info on that exhibition let me know. thanks in advance


Björki wrote:Lopez?![]()
he should have signed in.

Patrik77 wrote:Björki wrote:Lopez?![]()
he should have signed in.
If I was British I would be very disappointed on the organizers giving a WC to Lopez instead of a Brittish player. He hasn´t achieved anything that could be worth giving him a WC because he was lazy and didn´t sign in!

Patrik77 wrote:Björki wrote:Lopez?![]()
he should have signed in.
If I was British I would be very disappointed on the organizers giving a WC to Lopez instead of a Brittish player. He hasn´t achieved anything that could be worth giving him a WC because he was lazy and didn´t sign in!

Rosie wrote:Patrik77 wrote:Björki wrote:Lopez?![]()
he should have signed in.
If I was British I would be very disappointed on the organizers giving a WC to Lopez instead of a Brittish player. He hasn´t achieved anything that could be worth giving him a WC because he was lazy and didn´t sign in!
Well I am British - and personally I would rather see a quality player like Lopez, rather than some of the low ranked no-hopers that make up British tennis when you get past Henman, Rusedski and Murray. Having said that - my aversion to grass means I live virtually in walking distance of Queens and I won't be going there - so maybe I am not the right person to comment.
You go girl!


Rosie wrote:Well I am British - and personally I would rather see a quality player like Lopez, rather than some of the low ranked no-hopers that make up British tennis when you get past Henman, Rusedski and Murray. Having said that - my aversion to grass means I live virtually in walking distance of Queens and I won't be going there - so maybe I am not the right person to comment.



tasmanian tiger wrote:i disagree with several opinions here. first of all people shouldn't be bitching about lopez getting a wild card as much as they should about philippoussis. he's been getting wild cards everywhere for about 2 years now (based on his results 6 or 7 years ago) into countless tourneys he doesn't belong in. secondly, giving one wild card to a player like feliciano lopez (who is ranked high but didn't enter before the deadline) or a legitimate world renouned player who has fallen on hard times, is one thing, but three???????? as a british atp tourney, i think you have an obligation to give at least 3 wildcards to promising british players. a 2nd or 3rd round showing for such a player could boost their ranking tremendousley. i don't think england needs to pin all their tennis hopes on andy murray. so many young men grow up in england playing tennis, give them an opportunity to make it.

m-j-d wrote:Rosie wrote:Well I am British - and personally I would rather see a quality player like Lopez, rather than some of the low ranked no-hopers that make up British tennis when you get past Henman, Rusedski and Murray. Having said that - my aversion to grass means I live virtually in walking distance of Queens and I won't be going there - so maybe I am not the right person to comment.
I would question your real nationality and true interest in tennis!
If you are not interested in Queens I wonder why you are even visiting this forum!
Remember just over a year ago Murray was ranked over 400 and losing futures and remember too - without losers there would be no winners!


m-j-d wrote:OK Rosie, point taken about the tennis - Please accept my apologies for speaking out of turn and out of context within these forums, I am sorry if I offended, you are quite correct - tennis only.
You are very fortunate to have seen so much top level tennis so I can understand that Queens would be disappointing to you, as is Wimbledon no doubt as a grasscourt event.
For those less fortunate Queens is about as good as it gets and the majority would prefer to see W/Cs given to national players at whatever level than to foreign players, especially those elegible for MD who didnt bother to apply hence depriving others and to he who has had 15 WC entries into his last 16 events.
Being patriotic I guess that I just 'saw red' with your criticism of British events and British players and was too quick to reply - In future I will just take another blood pressure tablet and move on to another forum.
Fini.












if another player pulls out before qualies begin they can give his wildcard to another (problably british) playerdecrepitude wrote:How come Fish is now first on the alternate list for Queens, when he got a wildcard?

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests