
Nathaliia wrote:Bad info, Feńa. Hopefully nothing too serious to not to beat US in next DC round8)

Huta Galung did'nt get one as far as I knowFvE wrote:How many WC are there in Rotterdam Q?
I allways thougt 3, but there are 4 people with a wildcard now:
van Lottum, de Bakker, Huta Galung and Rastogi
Anyone know something about this?





Doubles intentions (just an expected list that ATP knows; No commitment for the teams)
Costa do Sauipe: Cermak/Friedl, Fyrstenberg/Matkowski
Memphis: Aspelin/Perry, Bryan/Bryan, Goldstein/Thomas, Kerr/Parrott, Knowles/Nestor
Rotterdam: Bhupathi/Moodie, Erlich/Ram, Hanley/Ullyett, Levinsky/Lindstedt
Jay
This new system really allows them to change I wonder if it was Mark or Daniel who preferred to play in Memphis.









Anonymous wrote:Oh, why Chucho withdrew from Costa do Sauipe
love,
Nathii
- from what I've heard, Chucho is just tired and wants a break. He has played almost every day for 2 weeks (and he normally plays doubles as well as singles), he is still involved in the Buenos Aires tournament as I write this- and he just feels his body needs a week off to rest. Nothing major to worry about at all. Must say - I thought you could not withdraw from a tournament while still involved in one the week before though 



Anonymous wrote:According to ATP RULE BOOK : " 3) No player may continue playing in an ATP or Challenger Series Tournament in singles or doubles after giving notice of withdrawal from a Tournament scheduled for the next week. "
So there are only two possible explanations .
1) Acasuso knew beforehand he was gonna lose , that is he lost on purpose .
2 ) If he had defeat Calleri he had been disqualifyed . Then Calleri would have been designated as the winner of the match or maybe Volandri would pass directly to the final without playing the semifinal ??
I don't understand anything



masto22 wrote:Anonymous wrote:According to ATP RULE BOOK : " 3) No player may continue playing in an ATP or Challenger Series Tournament in singles or doubles after giving notice of withdrawal from a Tournament scheduled for the next week. "
So there are only two possible explanations .
1) Acasuso knew beforehand he was gonna lose , that is he lost on purpose .
2 ) If he had defeat Calleri he had been disqualifyed . Then Calleri would have been designated as the winner of the match or maybe Volandri would pass directly to the final without playing the semifinal ??
I don't understand anything
Maybe he doesn`t know this rule.


seb wrote:Memphis qualies:
Who are these great champions who received a WC (and 1 ATP point) for Memphis qualies ? :
(WC)Damien Spizzo (AUS)
(WC)James Spence (NZL)
I guess they bought their WCs.
Do someone has more info ?



What happens when one more player pulls back? Will someone who only entered the qualies and didn't even won one match get in?Judio wrote:FOUR Lucky Losers are in so Far!!!!
Needn't have bothered with last round of Qualifying![]()
All EIGHT Players are now in the Draw

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest